Free subscription to Fair Measures monthly eNews.

Information here is correct at the time it is posted. Case decisions cited here may be reversed. Please do not rely on this information without consulting an attorney first.

2008

• Genetic Discrimination Now Illegal
• Four Key Concepts Keep You Out of Court
• Layoffs Lead to Lawsuits
• Company Ordered to Pay Punitive Damages After Manager Denied ADA Training
• Company Wins Case With Good Investigation & Training
• Your Legal "To Do" List

2007

• Final Warning to Harasser Must be Enforced
• "Hostile environment" or "Environmental harassment" - which is the right term for sexual harassment?
• Company's Training Torpedoed by One Joke from Chairman
• Court Rules: Promote Employees with Foreign Accents
• Fed Study Finds Family Medical Leave Law Doesn't Help in Cases of Chronic Disease
• Prevent Lawsuits for Harassment and Discrimination based on Family Responsibility
• Government Orders Company to Stop Computer-Based Training
• DOD Loses Harassment Case for Failure to Train Harasser
• Company Wins Harassment Case When Victim Refuses Counseling
• "Addicted to Internet" Protected Disability?
• Manager Who Failed to Interview Black Applicants Guilty of Discrimination
• 2007 New Year's Resolutions to Stay Out of Court

2006

• Background Checks Prevent Discrimination
• Court Requires UPS to Hire Deaf Drivers
• Managers Required to Stop Harassment from Outsiders
• Harassment Victim Wins Retaliation Lawsuit
• "Smoking Gun" Not Needed to Prove Retaliation
• U. S. Supreme Court Expands Definition of Retaliation
• Can Employers Require Women to Wear Makeup?
• Supreme Court Overturns TV "Friends" Case
• Company Loses Harassment Case Due to No Training
• Employers Must Report Employees Who Surf Illegal Websites
• New Case Holds Terminations Must be Handled Consistently
• New Year's Resolutions to Stay Out of Court

Back to Top

2005

• Screaming at Women is Sexual Harassment
• FBI Agent Loses Harassment Case, but Wins on Retaliation
• Office Affairs Lead to Successful Retaliation Claim
• Manager Wins Retaliation Case After Refusing to Fire Associate Illegally
• Screaming at Women is Sexual Harassment
• FBI Agent Loses Harassment Case, but Wins on Retaliation
• Office Affairs Lead to Successful Retaliation Claim
• Manager Wins Retaliation Case After Refusing to Fire Associate Illegally
• Landmark Case Holds Office Affairs Create Hostile Environment
• Company Wins Harassment Case After Supervisor Repeatedly Exposes Himself
• Employee Rights in the Blogosphere
• New Case Requires Supervisors to Report Their Manager's Harassment
• Federal Appeals Court Protects Transsexual
• Employee Wins Disability Harassment Case
• Workplace Sexual Assaults Require More Than Oral Warnings
• Employee Ordered to Pay $27 Million to Company

Back to Top

2004

• Multiple Harassment Policies Can Hurt Company
• California Requires Supervisor Sexual Harassment Training
• Promoting Harasser to Management Leads to Retaliation Case
• New Overtime Rules Now in Effect
• When a Harassed Employee Quits, Your Troubles May Just Be Starting
• Employees Now Winning Claims Under ADA, FMLA
• New Overtime Regulations Announced
• Fairness on the Job-It's Not Just Monkey Business!
• U. S. Supreme Court OKs Preferences for Older Workers
• Religion and Sexual Orientation Diversity: When Values Collide
• When Harassment Turns to Romance -- "Victim" Returns Money Settlement
• Watch Out for the References Set-Up!

Back to Top

2003

• Supreme Court Limits Damages in Harassment Cases
• Court Upholds Management's Right to Change Performance Ratings
• Losing Employee Ordered to Pay Employer's Court Costs
• Worker Rights When the Lights Go Out
• Court Rules Employee Does Not Have Right to be Laid Off
• Fire a Whistleblower, or Falsify Documents, and Go to Jail
• Employee Held to be Supervisor in Harassment Case
• Get Hip to HIPAA!
• Nod Your Head, Go to Court
• E-mail = Evidence: How To Protect Yourself
• $250 million settlement for age bias; California expands age protections
• Whistleblowers of the Year

Back to Top

2002

• Who are these people?
• Pregnant employee gets punitive damages
• New California law on family leave
• Protect your company against punitived damages
• Employees win failure to hire cases - even though they didn't apply for the jobs
• Supreme court reverses key ADA decision
• OSHA's new ergonomics plan:an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of citations!
• Identity theft prompts new privacy protections for employees
• Avoiding retaliation claims: don't get mad, don't get even
• Americans with Disabilities Act - gutted for good?
• The limits on freedom of speech at work

Back to Top

2001

• Employees allowed to have co-worker present in investigation meetings
• Federal harassment defenses not allowed under California law
• California employers required to grant sick leave for domestic partners
• EEOC updates discrimination guidelines
• After September 11: Employment law issues
• New cases & laws protect men who are "not man enough"
• Legal advice -- go see Legally Blond
• More men suing men for sexual harassment
• Steal trade secrets, go to jail
• Forced ranking - the right way
• Applicant who lies can be fired
• New law and regulations increase ability to hire foreign workers
• Snakes alive! or, What's a disability, anyway?

Back to Top

2000

• A tale of two employers
• How NOT to comply with the FMLA
• New rights for "whistleblowers"
• New law limits overtime for some employees
• Employer can be sued for harassment in on-line forum
• Disabled employees need not follow regular procedures to achieve reasonable accommodation
• Employer required to accommodate escalating requests for accommodation
• Abusive racial comments directed at other employees can aggravate effects of sexual harassment
• Employee loses discrimination case, wins $3 million + for retaliation
• "Seinfeld" case reversed on appeal; management upheld on all counts
• Company loses case because of outdated Harassment Policy
• Employer policy, investigation, action wins harassment cases
• Harassment investigations should go beyond complaint
• Few people "regarded as disabled" under ADA
• Courts find proposed ADA accommodations unreasonable
• California holds employees not liable for harassment
• California law prohibits firing for off-duty conduct

Back to Top

1999

• Evidence of harassment of other employees is admissable
• Employee ordered to pay company's legal fees
• Employer wins harassment case
• Company gets injunction against employee
• Promoting the "right person for the job" may be discrimination
• New California law prohibits using salary for layoff
• New California law requires sick leave for child's illness
• Lack of ADA training leads to punitive damages
• Employer's guide to new EEOC harassment guidelines
• New Supreme Court decisions on ADA substantially limit plaintiffs' claims
• Accrued sick leave and vacation pay may be "wages"
• Racial & sexual harassment against "snitch" illegal
• ADA accommodation duty requires a good faith interactive process
• "No leave" rule violates state pregnancy discrimination law
• Older worker constructively discharged when moved to "death cubicle"
• Sleep is major life activity; concentration is not.
• Prompt reporting and response eliminates sex harassment liability

Back to Top

Fall 1998

• Failure to redeploy older worker is age discrimination 01-05-99
• Failure to file sexual harassment complaint excuses company delay 12-22-98
• New employee can be fired for requesting maternity leave 12-08-98
• Sexist comments + bad documentation = sex discrimination 11-25-98
• What the buddha said about sexual harassment 11-10-98
• Managers NOT personally liable for mis-handling harassment complaints 10-27-98
• False claim of harassment not slander unless made with malice 10-13-98

Back to Top

Summer 1998

• Manager properly fired for off-site sexual activity 09-29-98
• Manager's attorneys fees paid if they acted in course & scope of employment 09-15-98
• Court orders employer to pay attorneys fees for sued manager 09-01-98
• Court details how to conduct a fair investigation 08-18-98
• Evidence of harassment of other employees admissible at trial 08-04-98
• Managers can NOT be sued personally for discrimination, Cal. Supreme Court holds 07-24-98
• Supreme Court rules in landmark sexual harassment cases 07-07-98
• Losing corrections officer ordered to pay employer's attorneys fees 06-23-98
• Employee who wins workers comp can't bring race discrimination suit 06-09-98

Back to Top

Spring 1998

• Sexual harassment cases rarely overturned, study shows 05-26-98
• Two new harassment cases buck conservative trend 05-12-98
• What the Paula Jones case means to you 04-21-98
• Calif. Supreme Court allows Boy Scouts to discriminate 04-07-98

Back to Top

Winter 1998

• Employer not required to accommodate religious pilgrimage 03-24-98
• What's new - U.S. Supreme Court rules on same-sex harassment & more 03-10-98
• N.J. Supreme Court rules one racist comment = harassment 02-22-98
• Handling stress held an essential function of the job 02-10-98
• Calif. Supreme Court upholds employer in important case 01-13-98
• California overtime rules change 1-1-98; change your policies, too 12-30-97
• Court holds sexual harassment training program protects company 12-23-97

Back to Top

Fall 1997

• Culture clash leads to age discrimination claim
• We told you your e-mails would get you
• California appeals court holds assault is not illegal harassment
• Bad treatment of older workers does not prove discrimination
• Inability to get along with others not covered by ADA
• Employee properly fired 3 years after misconduct
• New law expands applicant right to know
• Hooters wins in EEOC settlement
• Slurred speech condition may require accommodation
• Anti-affirmative action comments may prove discrimination
• Manic depressive employee properly fired when AWOL
• Veterans reemployment act violated by denial of promotion

Back to Top

Summer 1997

• 25-pound lifting restriction not a disability
• Customer list held to be trade secret
• Manager's oral promise creates a contract
• California employer may lay off higher paid workers
• Negative reference is illegal retaliation even if employee would not have been hired
• Microsoft loses independent contractor case -- again
• So what if it's legal? It's not right
• Employee wins for firing after refusing drug test
• Sex discrimination glass ceiling proved at Olsten
• One remark by CEO can prove age discrimination
• Employer found liable where it "should have known" sexual harassment occurring
• The world laughs at U. S. sexual attitudes
• Employee properly terminated for making threats
• Racist comment by supervisor does not prove race discrimination

Back to Top

Spring 1997

• California Supreme Court gives employees more time to sue
• Employee ordered to pay employer's court costs
• "At will" company sued for wrongful termination after layoff
• Hilton Hotel held liable for Tailhook
• Two new sexual harassment decisions continue conservative trend
• Employee takes religious freedom too far
• Retail clerk with epilepsy not protected by ADA
• Major California case expands ADA protections for employees
• Carpal tunnel syndrome may not be disability under ADA
• Ninth Circuit adopts "reasonable person" standard for sexual harassment

Back to Top

Winter 1997

• Don't force workers to celebrate birthdays
• Court rules in favor of aircraft safety whistleblower
• Employer may terminate woman who punches harasser
• No race discrimination where employer conducted good faith investigation
• Court limits retaliation claims
• Employer sued for fraud after giving good reference to sexual harasser
• Invalid EEO claim leads to valid retaliation case
• HR mistakes cost employer $17 million
• "Old timer" remark does not prove age discrimination
• Company upheld in firing alcoholic employee
• Good news for managers

Back to Top

Fall 1996

• Prop 209 and affirmative action
• Supervisor not personally liable for failing to stop sexual harassment
• Lessons from Texaco
• Company liable for alleged rape by supervisor in repressed memory case
• Sexual harassment in Texas
• First Amendment overrides religious harassment policy
• Employer discretion upheld in sexual harassment case
• Microsoft loses on independent contractors
• Disabled employee can't have it both ways
• Rethinking sexual harassment
• Small facility ordered to accommodate Sabbath

Back to Top

Summer 1996

• Major privacy rights case impacts stress claims
• Circumstantial evidence proves retaliation
• That's not sexual harassment, that's freedom of speech!
• Employee quits, wins constructive discharge case
• Employee ordered to pay company's lawyers
• Managers not personally liable for discrimination
• Sarcasm = Racism?
• Here's a switch - employer sues employees and wins

Back to Top

Spring 1996

• Non-disabled employee wins ADA case
• A new way of looking at sexual harassment
• Unsafe working environment leads only to workers compensation claim
• You don't have full freedom of speech at work
• An analysis of the supreme court's gay rights decision
• Silicon Valley African-American wins case against Lockheed
• Revising your policies? Give employees notice of major changes
• "Outing" gay employee held invasion of privacy
• Do you have a private life?
• Supervisor can sue for harassment by subordinate
• Husband violated employee agreement by supporting wife's business
• Accidentally putting confidential information on network drive is not slander
• Don't lie to applicants
• Laptops now exempt from export control?

Back to Top

Winter 1996

• Sexual favoritism is not sexual harassment
• Now THIS is discrimination
• Not All harassment is illegal
• Smokers have no right to privacy, says U. S. Supreme Court
• This is NOT sexual harassment
• Age discrimination found where top salesman fired
• Accommodations suggested by employee were unreasonable
• California Court affirms employee's duty of loyalty
• Car salesman fired for opposing sales training can pursue whistleblowing case

Back to Top